Bitcoin Energy Consumption Calculator
Compare Bitcoin vs. Traditional Payments
See how much more energy Bitcoin transactions consume compared to standard payment systems.
Results
Energy Facts from Sweden
Bitcoin: 707 kWh per transaction
Visa: 0.0023 kWh per transaction
Sweden's Mining Impact: 1 TWh (enough to power 200,000 homes) in 2022
Global Bitcoin Energy Use: 143 TWh in 2023 (more than Sweden or Norway's annual consumption)
Sweden doesn’t ban cryptocurrency. But if you’re trying to mine Bitcoin there, you’re fighting an uphill battle-not because of legality, but because of energy use.
Why Sweden Is Targeting Crypto Mining
In 2023, Sweden’s Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) and the Financial Stability Council didn’t just express concern-they demanded an EU-wide ban on Bitcoin mining. Their reasoning? Crypto mining is guzzling electricity at a scale that undermines Sweden’s climate goals. At its peak in 2022, Bitcoin mining in Sweden consumed nearly 1 terawatt-hour (TWh) of electricity annually. That’s enough to power 200,000 homes. And while Sweden’s grid is 84% renewable (mostly hydro and nuclear), every extra megawatt drawn from the grid still adds pressure to infrastructure and increases emissions from backup systems during peak demand. The numbers don’t lie. Bitcoin’s global energy use in 2023 was 143 TWh-more than Sweden or Norway uses in a year. A single Bitcoin transaction consumes about 707 kWh. Compare that to a Visa transaction: 0.0023 kWh. Sweden’s regulators see this as unsustainable. Erik Thedéen, head of FI, called it a direct contradiction to Sweden’s commitment to net-zero emissions by 2045.How Mining Moved to Sweden-and Why It’s Leaving
After China cracked down on crypto mining in 2021, operators flocked to countries with cheap, reliable power. Sweden, with its cold climate and abundant renewable energy, looked ideal. Data centers popped up in Norrbotten and Västerbotten, where winter temperatures naturally cool servers. But the sudden spike in demand alarmed officials. Between April and August 2022, mining energy use jumped by over 300%. Now, the tide is turning. A 2024 survey by the Swedish Crypto Mining Association found that 68% of mining companies plan to relocate by 2026. Norway is the top destination-its low taxes and abundant hydropower make it a magnet for miners. Germany and the U.S. are close behind. Meanwhile, 22% of Swedish miners are switching to proof-of-stake blockchains like Ethereum, which use 99.95% less energy.Sweden’s Regulatory Crackdown: More Than Just Rules
Sweden didn’t just write new laws-it built a wall of bureaucracy around mining. Since 2024, any crypto operation above 0.5 megawatts must:- Register with the Financial Supervisory Authority (FI)
- Submit quarterly environmental impact reports
- Disclose real-time energy consumption and source data
- Pass an Environmental Impact Assessment under the Swedish Environmental Code
Sweden vs. The Rest of Europe
Most European countries take a hands-off approach to mining. Germany and France require registration for exchanges but don’t touch mining operations. The EU’s MiCA regulation, adopted in 2024, only demands environmental disclosures in white papers-not bans. Sweden pushed for a full mining prohibition and lost. But it didn’t back down. Instead, it forced the EU to adopt stricter transparency rules. Sweden’s stance is unique because it doesn’t care if your energy is green. Norway and Iceland welcome miners because they have excess renewable power. Texas mines with 50-70% renewables and gets praised. Sweden says: “It’s not about the source. It’s about the total amount.” This philosophy makes Sweden the least crypto-friendly country in Europe, ranking 47th out of 50 in the 2024 Crypto Regulatory Index. Switzerland (3rd) and Germany (18th) are far more welcoming. But Sweden’s approach isn’t about being anti-tech-it’s about being anti-waste.The Hidden Benefits: Waste Heat and Innovation
Sweden’s response isn’t just about shutting things down. It’s about redirecting them. In 2025, the government allocated 200 million SEK ($18.4 million USD) to turn mining waste heat into district heating. A pilot project in Luleå recovered 65% of the heat generated by mining rigs and used it to warm homes and schools. That’s not just efficient-it’s circular. The Swedish Energy Agency’s Innovation for a Sustainable Energy System program has also funded 150 million SEK ($13.8 million USD) in projects helping miners switch to proof-of-stake or develop low-energy consensus mechanisms. Stockholm-based EcoChain, for example, converted its entire operation to proof-of-stake in 2024. Its energy use dropped from 1.2 GWh/year to 0.6 MWh/year-99.95% less. It still makes money from transaction fees.
What’s Happening Now? The New Reality in Sweden
By 2025, Sweden’s crypto mining energy use has dropped to under 1 TWh and is projected to fall to 0.8 TWh by year-end. Ethereum’s shift to proof-of-stake in 2022 alone cut Sweden’s mining footprint by 30%. New mining rigs are rare. Most new activity is in blockchain development-not mining. Stockholm’s Kista Science City is now home to 120 blockchain companies, most focused on enterprise solutions, supply chain tracking, and identity verification. These don’t need massive power. They’re software-first, not hardware-heavy. The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority’s 2025 Strategic Plan confirms the shift: no more calls for mining bans. Instead, they’re exploring carbon pricing for energy-intensive crypto operations. The goal isn’t to kill crypto-it’s to make sure it doesn’t cost the planet.What This Means for You
If you’re a miner: Sweden is no longer a viable location unless you’re switching to proof-of-stake or using waste heat systems. The paperwork is heavy, the banking is hostile, and the public sentiment is against you. If you’re a developer or entrepreneur: Sweden still offers strong support for non-mining blockchain innovation. Grants, tech hubs, and a skilled workforce make it a great place to build blockchain applications-just don’t plug in a rig. If you’re an investor: Sweden’s regulatory stance signals a broader European trend. The future of crypto isn’t in energy-hungry mining. It’s in efficiency, transparency, and real-world utility. Countries that embrace that shift will lead. Sweden is forcing the industry to evolve-whether it likes it or not.Is Bitcoin mining illegal in Sweden?
No, Bitcoin mining is not illegal in Sweden. However, it is heavily regulated. Any mining operation above 0.5 megawatts must register with the Financial Supervisory Authority, submit detailed environmental reports, and disclose real-time energy use. Many banks have stopped serving mining businesses, making operations difficult to sustain.
Why is Sweden so strict on crypto mining compared to other countries?
Sweden focuses on total energy consumption, not just the source. Even if a mine runs on 100% renewable energy, Sweden still sees the electricity draw as a threat to grid stability and climate goals. Countries like Norway and Iceland welcome mining because they have surplus renewable power. Sweden doesn’t-its grid is already tightly managed for homes and industry.
Can I still mine crypto in Sweden profitably?
It’s extremely difficult. High regulatory costs, banking restrictions, and public opposition make traditional proof-of-work mining unviable for most. Some operators are switching to proof-of-stake or repurposing hardware for waste heat recovery projects. Profitability now depends on innovation, not hashing power.
What happened to the miners who moved to Sweden after China’s ban?
Many have left. A 2024 survey showed 68% of Swedish mining firms plan to relocate by 2026, mostly to Norway, Germany, or the U.S. Those who stayed are either converting to proof-of-stake, partnering with district heating systems, or operating at minimal scale to avoid regulatory scrutiny.
Is Ethereum mining still a thing in Sweden?
No. Ethereum switched from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake in September 2022. That cut its energy use by 99.95%. Any Ethereum mining in Sweden today is either outdated equipment or a misunderstanding. The focus now is on running validators, which use minimal power and are not targeted by Sweden’s mining restrictions.
Are there any crypto-friendly regions in Sweden?
Not really. All municipalities follow national guidelines, and many have added stricter local rules. Boden limits new mines to 5 MW. Kiruna requires 90% renewable verification. Even in remote areas with cheap power, banking and regulatory barriers make operations nearly impossible. The only crypto-friendly space left is in software development, not mining.
Elizabeth Melendez
November 2, 2025 AT 01:50Okay but let’s be real - Sweden’s not anti-crypto, they’re anti-waste. I used to think mining was cool until I saw how much power one rig uses. Like, imagine running a hair dryer nonstop for a week just to validate one transaction? That’s insane. The fact they’re turning waste heat into home heating? Genius. That’s the future - not just shutting things down, but making them useful. I wish more countries thought like this instead of just saying ‘let’s tax it’ and calling it a day.
Genevieve Rachal
November 3, 2025 AT 14:26So what, we’re supposed to feel bad for miners now? They knew the risks. If you’re running a power-hungry operation in a country with climate goals, you’re not a victim - you’re a liability. And don’t give me that ‘but it’s renewable!’ crap. Renewable doesn’t mean infinite. The grid still has limits. Sweden’s doing what no one else has the guts to do.
Bruce Bynum
November 5, 2025 AT 09:00Love this. Not because I hate crypto - I love blockchain tech. But mining? It’s 2025. We’ve got better ways. Switching to proof-of-stake isn’t giving up, it’s upgrading. Sweden’s not banning innovation - they’re forcing it to grow up.
Masechaba Setona
November 5, 2025 AT 18:15Of course Sweden’s doing this. They’re just using climate change as an excuse to crush American capitalism. Next they’ll ban Bitcoin because it’s ‘too American.’ Wake up. This isn’t about energy - it’s about control. They want to dictate what tech you can use. And guess who’s paying for it? You and me.
Phil Higgins
November 7, 2025 AT 04:29My cousin runs a small mining farm in Norway now - he moved after Sweden’s rules got brutal. He said the paperwork in Sweden was worse than filing taxes for three businesses at once. And banks just ghosted them. No warning. No explanation. Just ‘your account is closed.’ Meanwhile, Norway’s like ‘come on in, here’s a warm handshake and a hydropower line.’ Honestly? Sweden’s being a bully. But maybe… maybe they’re right? I don’t know anymore. I just miss when tech felt like freedom, not bureaucracy.
Jeremy Jaramillo
November 7, 2025 AT 22:57I think people are missing the bigger picture. Sweden isn’t rejecting crypto - they’re rejecting the *inefficiency*. Proof-of-work is like using a horse-drawn carriage to deliver packages in 2025. The tech itself? Still valuable. The energy waste? Not acceptable. The fact they’re funding waste-heat projects? That’s innovation with responsibility. We need more of that, not less.
Wesley Grimm
November 9, 2025 AT 16:261 TWh is nothing compared to global energy use. This is performative regulation. Sweden’s population is 10 million. They’re not even using 0.1% of global electricity. This is symbolism, not substance. The real issue? Crypto’s being used to bypass capital controls - and Sweden’s scared of that, not the power draw.
ISAH Isah
November 11, 2025 AT 01:29Sweden is not a country it is a concept a concept of purity a concept of guilt a concept of control the energy is not the issue the issue is the individual the individual who dares to think outside the grid the individual who dares to mine the individual who dares to be free the state cannot tolerate this freedom so it hides behind climate the climate is a mask the mask is the law the law is the cage
Bhavna Suri
November 12, 2025 AT 08:18This is ridiculous. Why punish people for using electricity? We all use electricity. Why single out miners? It’s just another way to control technology. I don’t understand how this helps the planet.
Eliane Karp Toledo
November 13, 2025 AT 12:56They say it’s about energy but I bet the real reason is the IMF and EU are pressuring them to kill crypto. Look at the timeline - right after the EU’s MiCA passed, Sweden went nuclear on mining. Coincidence? I don’t think so. This is a geopolitical move disguised as environmentalism. They don’t care about your grid. They care about your money.
naveen kumar
November 15, 2025 AT 12:22Let me guess - next they’ll ban solar panels because they’re ‘too efficient’ and cause grid instability. Or maybe ban electric cars because they use too much lithium. This is not environmentalism. This is authoritarianism disguised as science. They’re not saving the planet. They’re saving their own power structures.
bob marley
November 15, 2025 AT 13:34So let me get this straight - Sweden’s like ‘you can’t mine Bitcoin here’ but they’re fine with a 2000 hp Tesla driving 200 miles to get coffee? That’s not logic. That’s hypocrisy. They hate crypto because it’s decentralized. Not because it’s ‘wasteful.’ Wake up. This isn’t about energy. It’s about control.
Derek Hardman
November 17, 2025 AT 05:38It is worth noting that Sweden's approach, while severe, is not without precedent. The United Kingdom once imposed strict controls on coal usage in urban areas during the 1950s. The motivation was public health. The outcome was cleaner air. The resistance was immense. Today, we call it progress. Perhaps Sweden's stance will be viewed similarly in twenty years. Not as oppression, but as foresight.