Crypto Banking Restrictions Rescinded in US: 2025 Changes 11 Dec 2025

Crypto Banking Restrictions Rescinded in US: 2025 Changes

Crypto Banking Services Calculator

Check which crypto services are now permitted under the 2025 regulatory changes. Select a service to see if banks can legally offer it.

Service Eligibility

Select a service to see if it's permitted under 2025 rules

What Changed in US Crypto Banking in 2025?

For years, American banks were stuck in a regulatory gray zone when it came to cryptocurrency. If you wanted to offer crypto custody, hold stablecoins, or run a node on a blockchain network, you had to jump through hoops-submitting detailed notices, waiting months for approval, and proving you had enough controls in place just to do what other banks did every day with cash or stocks. That all changed on April 24, 2025, when the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) quietly but decisively rescinded nearly all of the Biden-era restrictions on crypto banking.

The Old Rules That Held Banks Back

Before 2025, banks had to follow three major rules that made crypto services nearly impossible to offer at scale. First, under SR 22-6 from 2022, state member banks had to notify the Federal Reserve before even thinking about offering crypto services. Second, SR 23-8 in 2023 required banks to get formal approval before handling dollar-denominated tokens like USDC or USDT. Third, the OCC’s Interpretive Letter 1179 from 2021 had effectively blocked national banks from offering crypto custody unless they got special permission.

These weren’t just paperwork hurdles. They created fear. Banks didn’t know how long approval would take-some waited over a year. Others gave up entirely. Even big institutions like JPMorgan and Bank of America avoided crypto services not because they didn’t want to, but because the regulatory risk outweighed the reward. The FDIC’s FIL-16-2022 added another layer, forcing insured banks to report any crypto activity before doing it. The result? A banking system that stayed out of crypto while fintech startups and crypto-native firms filled the gap.

The 2025 Regulatory Reset

By March 2025, the tide turned. The OCC led the charge with Interpretive Letter 1183, which officially scrapped Interpretive Letter 1179. The message was clear: national banks and federal savings associations can now custody crypto, hold stablecoin reserves, and participate in blockchain node networks without asking for permission. The OCC said their staff now understands the tech well enough to supervise it through regular exams-not special approvals.

The FDIC followed on March 28, 2025, saying supervised institutions no longer need prior approval for crypto activities as long as they manage risk properly. That means banks can now offer crypto wallets, custody, and stablecoin settlement services without waiting for a regulator’s green light. Then, on April 24, the Federal Reserve pulled the plug on SR 22-6 and SR 23-8. No more advance notice. No more non-objection requests. Just normal banking supervision.

Along with these changes, all three agencies withdrew two key joint statements from early 2023 that had painted crypto as inherently risky. Those statements had been used to justify the strict rules. Their removal wasn’t just symbolic-it removed the legal basis for treating crypto differently from other assets.

A customer using a smartphone to send a stablecoin transfer in a bright, sunlit bank lobby.

What Banks Can Do Now

With the old rules gone, banks can legally offer several crypto services without jumping through hoops:

  • Crypto custody - Holding Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other tokens for customers, just like they hold stocks or bonds.
  • Stablecoin reserves - Holding USDC, USDT, or other dollar-backed tokens as part of customer accounts or payment systems.
  • Node participation - Running nodes on public blockchains like Ethereum or Bitcoin to verify transactions.
  • Crypto-enabled payments - Processing payments using stablecoins between businesses or individuals.

Importantly, these services are now treated like any other banking activity. If a bank wants to offer mobile banking, it doesn’t need to ask permission. Same goes for crypto now. The regulators aren’t saying crypto is safe-they’re saying banks are capable of managing the risk themselves, and that’s enough.

What’s Still Not Allowed (Yet)

Don’t get the wrong idea. This wasn’t a full green light for everything crypto. Banks still can’t:

  • Hold non-stablecoin crypto-assets (like Bitcoin or Ethereum) on their own balance sheets as investments.
  • Lend crypto directly to customers (no crypto loans or margin trading).
  • Offer crypto derivatives or futures through traditional banking channels.

These gaps remain because regulators are still working on them. The Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC have said they’re collaborating with the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets to draft new guidance. That means more rules could come later-but for now, the biggest barriers are gone.

Digital blockchain nodes connected by light threads rising beside bank towers at sunrise.

Why This Matters for You

If you’re a regular bank customer, this change means you’ll soon see crypto services popping up in your online banking app. Big banks like Wells Fargo, Citibank, and PNC are already preparing to launch crypto wallets and stablecoin transfers. You won’t need to sign up with Coinbase or Kraken-you’ll be able to buy Bitcoin or send USDC directly from your checking account.

For small businesses, this could mean faster, cheaper payments. Stablecoins settled on blockchain can clear in seconds, not days. No more waiting for ACH transfers or paying high fees to PayPal. Banks can now offer that as a built-in feature.

And for crypto startups, this is a game-changer. Instead of partnering with offshore banks or struggling to find a banking partner, they can now work with American institutions that have full legal backing. That means more innovation, more competition, and better services for everyone.

The Bigger Picture

This isn’t just about crypto. It’s about how regulators think about technology. For four years, the U.S. treated digital assets like a dangerous experiment. Now, they’re treating them like a tool-something that can be used safely if managed properly. The shift reflects a growing understanding that blockchain isn’t going away, and trying to stop banks from engaging with it only pushes innovation overseas.

Other countries are already moving faster. The EU passed its MiCA framework in 2024. Singapore and Switzerland have clear rules for crypto banking. The U.S. was falling behind. The 2025 changes are a correction, not a revolution. But it’s a big one.

What Comes Next?

Expect a wave of new crypto services from traditional banks in 2025 and 2026. You’ll likely see:

  • Stablecoin deposits with interest (like savings accounts but in USDC).
  • Instant cross-border payments using crypto rails.
  • Integrated crypto buying and selling inside mobile banking apps.
  • Business accounts that accept crypto as payment and auto-convert to USD.

Regulators will keep an eye on fraud, money laundering, and market stability. But they’re no longer trying to block the door-they’re opening it, and asking banks to walk through responsibly.

14 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Lynne Kuper

    December 11, 2025 AT 10:42
    Finally. I’ve been waiting for this since 2022. My bank still treats crypto like it’s contraband. Now they’ve got no excuse. Time to move my Bitcoin from Coinbase to my checking app. Let’s see if they actually deliver or just slap on another 17-page disclaimer.
  • Image placeholder

    Lloyd Cooke

    December 12, 2025 AT 07:22
    The epistemological pivot here is profound. No longer is cryptocurrency an ontological anomaly within the financial apparatus; it has been ontologized as a legitimate instrument of value transmission. The regulatory apparatus, once shackled by precautionary dogma, now embraces a hermeneutics of functional equivalence. One wonders whether this constitutes a reification of capital’s abstract nature-or merely its more efficient colonization of everyday life.
  • Image placeholder

    Madison Surface

    December 13, 2025 AT 09:24
    I cried when I read this. Not because I’m emotional-though I am-but because I’ve watched my cousin in Austin get denied a business account for running a crypto consulting firm. She had to move to Wyoming. Now? She can finally bank in her own damn state. This isn’t just policy. It’s dignity. And yes, I’m still crying. Don’t judge me.
  • Image placeholder

    Tiffany M

    December 14, 2025 AT 13:14
    Oh my god YES!!! I’ve been screaming into the void since 2021!!! Banks were acting like Bitcoin was a virus and stablecoins were witchcraft!!! I’ve had to use Kraken just to pay my landlord!!! Now I can just send USDC from my Chase app like I’m Venmoing my roommate!!! THANK YOU REGULATORS FOR NOT BEING COMPLETE IDIOTS FOR ONCE!!!
  • Image placeholder

    Eunice Chook

    December 14, 2025 AT 14:43
    This is a trap. They’re letting banks do custody because they know it’ll be messy. When the first $200M hack happens, they’ll come back with new rules. And this time, they’ll blame the banks. Don’t be fooled. This isn’t freedom. It’s a liability handoff.
  • Image placeholder

    Lois Glavin

    December 16, 2025 AT 08:15
    I’m just glad my mom can finally use her bank app to buy some Bitcoin without having to call six departments and fill out a form that requires a notary. She’s 72. She doesn’t care about blockchain. She just wants to save for her grandkids. And now she can. That’s all that matters.
  • Image placeholder

    Kim Throne

    December 16, 2025 AT 12:36
    The regulatory clarity afforded by the rescission of SR 22-6, SR 23-8, and IL 1179 constitutes a material reduction in operational uncertainty for federally chartered institutions. This development aligns with the principle of risk-based supervision, wherein the regulatory burden is calibrated to the nature and scale of the activity rather than the asset class. It is a necessary and overdue evolution.
  • Image placeholder

    Toni Marucco

    December 18, 2025 AT 06:48
    The beauty of this isn’t the crypto-it’s the surrender of fear. For years, regulators treated blockchain like a child with a flamethrower: ‘Don’t touch it, it’s dangerous!’ But now they’ve stepped back, looked at the kid, and said, ‘You’ve got gloves. You’ve got training. Go ahead.’ That’s maturity. That’s leadership. And honestly? It’s the most American thing they’ve done in a decade.
  • Image placeholder

    Kathryn Flanagan

    December 20, 2025 AT 02:49
    You know what’s wild? I remember when my cousin tried to open a crypto business account in 2020 and the bank manager asked her if she was selling ‘internet money’ and if it was like PayPal. She said yes. He said no. Then he called the compliance officer. It took six months. Now? She’s got a whole team at Wells Fargo helping her set up stablecoin payroll. I’m so proud. I cried again. Sorry.
  • Image placeholder

    Ian Norton

    December 21, 2025 AT 16:22
    Who authorized this? No one asked us. No public vote. No hearings. Just a quiet press release after Easter weekend. This is regulatory capture disguised as progress. The banks got what they wanted. The public got a PR win. The real risks? Still buried in the fine print.
  • Image placeholder

    Sue Gallaher

    December 21, 2025 AT 22:11
    This is why we lost the economy. Now banks can hold crypto? So what? Next they’ll be letting Chinese companies run nodes. We used to be the best. Now we’re just copying everyone else. And why? Because the left got scared of saying no. Weak. Pathetic.
  • Image placeholder

    Nicholas Ethan

    December 23, 2025 AT 18:44
    The removal of SR 22-6 and SR 23-8 represents a structural shift in supervisory posture. However, the absence of explicit capital requirements for crypto custody exposes institutions to unquantified tail risk. The OCC’s reliance on existing risk frameworks is insufficient. The market will pay the price.
  • Image placeholder

    Hari Sarasan

    December 24, 2025 AT 01:38
    In India, we still cannot legally hold crypto via banking channels. We are forced to use peer-to-peer exchanges with KYC circumvention. This U.S. regulatory shift is a masterclass in institutional courage. Meanwhile, our central bank insists blockchain is a ‘speculative illusion.’ The asymmetry is not merely economic-it is existential.
  • Image placeholder

    Jessica Eacker

    December 26, 2025 AT 00:16
    I just hope they don’t mess this up by making the app UI worse than my grandma’s iPhone. If I have to tap through 12 screens to send USDC, I’m just gonna use Cash App. Keep it simple. Please.

Write a comment